It seems strange that a Marketer role cannot do more. Our client users need to make random adhoc changes to the website and we've found that Marketer Role is not sufficent for them to perform their 'marketing' duties and thus have had to upgrade them to Designer.... But they aren't designer they are content editors who may need to do more than the current Marketer role capability but they dont need control to design with all features. I feel like there needs to be a middle ground here or perhaps another way of billing for these users.

This client has 3 users who need their own accounts but each only logs in to make changes intermittently during the year yet webflow charge $39 (USD) per month for Designer but the user is way off from being a designer - they just need to do their job as a marketer.

For this client they have two Content Editors and one Designer role. It is very expensive for the number of edits they do but if they want to make edits this is the cost. $828 USD per year.

It would be better if the hosting fee was higher and the user fee was lower

It woudl be better if the Marketer Role was by its definition sufficent permission for a marketer to do their job. Thats not designing but it is more control than they have currently.