The editorial workflow (boiled down) essentially goes:
1. Someone drafts a post
2. An editor reviews it
2a. Editor makes changes and approves or sends it back to 1
3. The post is published (or scheduled)
It would be awesome if Webflow incorporated these stages in a more productized manner. So, when a piece is created, an editor is notified. The editor then dives in, where they can make edits or comments and either send it to publish or "reject" it—i.e., push it back to the creator.
Presumably this would require the following additional features:
1. More roles and permissions (writers who can draft but not publish, editors who can review and publish)
3. Change tracking and annotation
John Moore Williams
.svg){kind=logo}
Needed! It would be easier to review/comment/manage articles written by different authors.
This is needed Top 7
Editor roles needed for large-scale site, like a college, where content needs to be added by MANY editors, but access to certain pages needs to be restricted. Can't justify purchase of enterprise without this feature.
Peoples are so addicted to play card game.If any one wants to play Online Join me at this platform hearts card game online free and follow some simple steps to redirected at game Homepage.
This is needed ASAP
We'd like a role/ permissions for writers that can draft but not publish. I'm always surprised how many CMS's don't have proper roles and permissions given the fact they exist to help manage content! Roles and permissions are essential for content based workflows.
Ha, yeah, I've done something somewhat similar with Zapier :)
A good idea, and would be enhanced with my proposed idea of integrating markdown.
https://wishlist.webflow.com/ideas/WEBFLOW-I-261
This workflow may be able to be (kinda) hacked together with project management app and zapier. I've done something kinda similar with contentful and zapier.
Yep great idea