Really sad how ignorant Webflow deals with this top voted requirement.

Weglot is way too expensive. Not helping at all. Here in Europe pretty much every second business needs more than 1 language. Especially here in Switzerland, we have 4 native languages.

Weglot only provides subdomain support, no subdirectory support. Being able to use subdirectories is a must for SEO. When your current site uses subdirectories for example .com/en or .com/de and you swap to en.domain.com and de.domain.com the penalty for SEO is HUGE.

This is absolutly neccessary!!!

This really needs to get done. We have built a big corporate website and using Weglot does not work at all for us and I believe a lot of others developers agree on this..

Get this done Webflow..

DO THIS WITH PRIORITY. it is a base funicionality.

How can this not be a priority? Webflow says there is Weglot out there (there are actually numerous other options) but it is so expensive that it hurts our business case (and Webflow's). And even if you don't look at the price, it is just not maintanable for larger websites, where every comma changed in the original language changes the end translation. How can you even pretend this is a solution? It's preposterous and arrogant from Webflow.

Have been using Weglot on several projects lately. It's just not good enough for enterprise solutions. The UX experience for the client is terrible and there is a lot of issues with SEO, handling language versions of files and links, URL translations and much more. Weglot is an impressive hack, but it's exactly that; a hack, NOT a viable solution.

come on webflow! you will lose me over this one..

wow, this is from 2017, is ranked second in popular and webflow keeps recommanding 3rd party solutions?

I don't mind paying something for automatic translation. However, I would like to have both the functionality and hosting of my pages in one place; Webflow. That is also the reason why I am not on WordPress.

In my eyes it is a wrong decision not to prioritize this fundamental function of a CMS.

You don't even need to do full multi-lang or translation support. Simply allowing multiple template pages for a CMS collection but get us 90% of the way there. Then multi-language content would be as easy as making multiple text fields for different languages in a CMS collection, and use one template page for one language and a second for the other. See comments in https://wishlist.webflow.com/ideas/WEBFLOW-I-74. This at least should be built in, even if you're not going to do the full thing.

This is also major concern of holding us back to migrate our large corporate site to Webflow. Weglot is not a viable solution for us nor is duplicating content. I would really like to see this being added natively.

Webflow not supporting multi-language natively is causing HUGE headaches for us. We cannot use Weglot to accomplish what we need to do, and duplicating tons of CMS collections that don't carry over their settings makes our job a complete nightmare. This issue must get solved or Webflow cannot be considered a true solution for multi-lingual needs. I will continue using Webflow for all single language websites cause it's so great, but for muli-language that will be a different story in the future. I sure do hope the team at Webflow realizes the importance of this feature natively.

Can we have an option to directly override the weglot translations ?
That would be a good quick fix for many of us..

Hi there, not considering this as a priority sends a very bad message to webflow users. I'm really happy with all the functions and the convenience that webflow delivers but with this behavior concerning an issue that is clearly an absolute must-have for many of your users, I find myself reconsidering the decision to further build on the webflow service. I'm willing to pay the webflow subscription and hosting prices for the services we get so far (as I said I'm happy with that) but the slow progress on the multi-language issue paired with the obvious advertisement for WEGLOT conveys the impression of a solely money-oriented alliance. I get it - that's business, but please consider that this could be a major decision driver for users in the future to further use webflow as their faith decreases.

Hey there. I would also like for Webflow team to reconsider this priority. With corona moving businesses online, a major appeal is to attract a larger more international market. It is a business need on your customer's side, shouldn't it be yours?

I remember when in 2017 I started using Webflow with the promise that multi-language support is coming.

Now it is four years later and you decided that this is not a priority? Hugely disappointing!

I cannot justify the additional costs of using a third-party solution to my clients!

Really disappointing this decision has not been overturned.

A huge chunk of faith lost. Is this platform worth spending money if after years, huge promises just vanish?

This is Adobe-level support & recognition of Very Bad Developer Honesty.

The problem with 3rd party solutions is that they are very expensive. As an independant bloger with limited income that speaks 3 languages fluentll and actually a professional translator & editor, I see no reason whatsoever to pay for something that I can do much better.